Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
Love it! A guy hasn't been a Flames for more than 10 games and the usual suspects are crapping all over him. Why do I have a feeling that the same would be happening to Bartowski if he were a Flame?
|
I might not be an NHL scout, but i have seen enough hockey in my time to see that Hanowski has major work to do in his skating to make the NHL.
As for your other post, some of us saw that Bartowski was ready for a cup of coffee with an NHL team, and thought he was a much better throw in player, "asset value wise" over the 2 players we got from Pitt. Add in the Russian and it was a no brainer on which trade was better.
The only reason the 2 players from the Pitt deal got praise was that the trade came out of left field and they were already members of the flames. The usual "koolaid" drinkers started praising them because they were flames. The Boston deal that fell through took hours, so CP had time to bash the players from that deal because they were not flames yet. Those CP had this image of getting top prospect after top prospect , plus 1st's for Iggy. THey were not realistic.
I shake my head at posters that think the 2 deals are similar.