Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi
These are the types of threads where fans from other boards come to laugh at us.
Sakic is an all-time player. Iginla, sadly, is not. The only argument in Iginla's favour is that Iginla played on a worse team. CliffFletcher pretty much nailed why that's not a great argument.
I think Sakic's later career when compared to Iginla's eventual late career numbers will cement this argument in Sakic's favour.
|
Read the thread before you post your one-liners and then cease to reply again.