View Single Post
Old 05-21-2013, 02:14 PM   #111
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
It's plain that the governing principle of the Flames franchise for the last 10 years has been to make Jarome Iginla happy. To that end, management:
  • Brought in players Iginla liked
  • Brought back players that Iginla liked
  • Turfed every coach that got exasperated with the Iginla-led players
  • Continued to operate in a Win Now mode to keep the goal of winning with Iginla alive
  • Tip-toed around serious and ongoing issues with the compete level of the veteran players

If the Flames started making serious re-tool moves three of four seasons ago - moving out Phaneuf for picks and prospects, moving Regehr for picks and prospects, hanging onto their own 1st and 2nd rounders instead of dealing for Jokinen and other vets - Jarome Iginla would not have been a happy camper. They would have had to move him too.

Flames management has been incompetent in a lot of ways and for a long time. But their biggest mistake in the last five years was treating Iginla like something more than what he is - which is a commodity. I hope they learn their lesson, and never treat another player, regardless of how big a star or how well liked, as though he's bigger than the team.
There's 2 ways to look at this:

1) They did all of the above to keep Iginla happy, as you've suggested or;

2) They did all of the above to get the most out of Iginla (& the rest of D. Sutter's "core"; Kipper, Regehr & briefly Phaneuf)

In retrospect both perspectives are incredibly flawed. I think you are correct though; they had better have learned their lesson. Build for long-term success.

Sutter & King both knew they had a very limited window to win with that 'core'. They threw everything they could at it & knew they were gambling the future success of the club. We're now paying the price.
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote