I'm really not ok with funding stadiums and arenas so owners can maximize their revenues. If a multisport stadium is built as a replacement for McMahon and will consistently serve purposes other than CFL and the Dinos, then I can accept this.
When part of the argument for is "lost revenue streams" you lose me. That's part of cost of doing business. You want to access that revenue stream? You pay for the upgrades to reach it.
It's going to be nice to have a new Flames arena as well, but it's going to burn my ass when we contribute taxes to it and then we're going to get charged more just to get into the new building and see the same product.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|