View Single Post
Old 05-16-2013, 12:20 PM   #676
Cleveland Steam Whistle
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Q_ View Post
Yeah, I think both sides of this debate are a lot closer than we would like to admit. Most on here would be OK with a portion of it being funded by tax payers. I think also, all of us don't want it to be funded entirely on the public's dime.

The main issue I see is whether or not a project like this is needed.
That's exactly it. My opinion on the matter is it's clear a new Arena is needed for sure based on this city's needs:

- Dome's ability to continue to facilitate our NHL, WHL, Lacrosse teams is likely at most 10 years left of life (and those last years will be really pushing it)
- Already lossing out on concerts, so an upgrade is already much more needed now.

For, me, the debate remains on an new Outdoor stadium is required. Rigth now McMahon is good enough for the the CFL, which lets be honest, isn't exactly a top notch league and doesn't require the best facilities. But looking forward, how much more can the CFL team bring in in a new facility, what is the potential for and benefit for this city on a permenant Soccer tenant of some sort, what one off events could we go after (like world cup) and outdoor larger concernts (which we've never had really) if we had a new outdoor stadium facility. I'm excited about the idea of such a facility, but the city's need for this is much more debatable than the new arena.

The city has proven it needs and uses a top notch hockey rink over the past 3 decades, we've never had a top notch outdoor facility and I'd say it's debatable that a city with a Metro area of 1.5M needs one, but I'd love to see it.

Last edited by Cleveland Steam Whistle; 05-16-2013 at 12:22 PM.
Cleveland Steam Whistle is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Cleveland Steam Whistle For This Useful Post: