[GGG]

The one thing I struggle with this case is the difference between what was legal. Kill the baby prior to birth and what he did kill the baby after birth. I have a huge issue that the location of a baby can make what he did legal or not. If society is comfortable with a late term abortion why does it make a difference where it occurred. All of the justifications for late term abortions usually being fetus health quality of life arguments are just as valid before and after birth.

If the intent of the patient was to go in and have an abortion and the end result was a dead fetus and a healthy patient why does what happen in between entering and leaving the clinic matter in the eyes of the law.

Now in this case he broke the abortion law for late term abortions so deserves to be punished.

For the record I am against abortion in most circumstances but favour the legal right to choose.