This case really has nothing to do with pro-choice versus anti-abortion. It has everything to do with a monster that clearly broke the law, was a predator, that put lives in danger with his practices and made a lot of money doing it.
This thing was a textbook example of a serial predator.
Whether he gets the gas or gets the needle or gets life in prison is irrelevant to me.
It sounds like his attorney had little to nothing to work with, was unable to call any witnesses to save his client and resorted to cheap theatrics in the court room.
I would guess that the only real appeal would be ineffective council, but I think that one really only works after sentencing.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|