Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain_Obvious
Which is funny, because that's EXACTLY what you did... except you didn't even use said blurb to form a sound, sane opinion.
Looking at PIM and drawing a concrete conclusion like you did is ridiculous.
Several people have pointed that out and you've gone off with posts full of broken sentences like a computer program trying to comprehend a code that doesn't compute.
|
PIM is a fact.... just like Goals scored is a fact . Grittiness and strength on the puck and skating styles are opinions that are subject to individual bias and interpretation.
The fact that Lindholm had 2 PIM while playing over 15 minutes a game in 48 games does not substantiate the assertion that he plays a gritty game and goes into the hard areas.
Try to find one comparable.
I will attempt to provide a comparable of a similar sized player with play making ability... (Lindholm at all levels has significant more assists than goals) and he plays on the wing.
I understand that you might be upset that I am saying that Lindholm is a playmaker as that is simply my interpretation of the Stats/facts.
One of the softest Flames is Tanquay... He is strong on the puck . Even he gets 20-50 PIM a season.
Will Lindholm be a Tanguay replacement?