Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
And so we're right back where we started.
Everyone not wearing Canucks' blue stated quite clearly; 'Luongo has negative trade value because of his boat anchor of a contract.'
Those wearing Canucks' blue disagreed, including Gillis, believing that they would not trade Luongo if they didnt get value of the deal. So they held him.
Now Gillis realizes that Luongo has negative trade value because of his boat anchor of a contract.
I think we can all agree now that Roberto Luongo has negative trade value because of his boat anchor of a contract.
Yes.
|
Not sure what you are saying? Also depends on what you mean as negative value?
Up until the deadline Loungo did not have negative value. What the Luongo situation had was an inept GM, that thought he could get a top 6 player and prospect for him. If he lowered his price Lou would have been traded.
Going forward i don't think they will get much or anything. Negative value to me would be Buy Out. I don't think they have to go that route. Maybe a 6-7th rd pick or waivers.