Quote:
Originally Posted by FakenHaken
I may not agree with user "Moon" all the time, but 100% of the time I understand his rational and reasons. Therefore, I do respect, even if I don't agree.
This post makes no sense, and has no rationality unless of course your intent is to simply say you like Monahan more than Lindholm. Great and a fine point you have made sir along with the other ~44% of the people who agree.
|
Which part of the rationale doesn't make sense?
Basically what he is saying is
- The Flames are now a small team with small prospects that are not physically hard to play against
- In general he believes that NHL teams only have room for 3 all-skill-no-grit players.
- If two prospects are close in skill and potential then we need to pick the bigger, tougher player to compensate for all of our soft "all skill" players.
- He feels that Monahan has demonstrated more grit than Lindholm and provided an example of him standing up to a bigger, more mature player.
I thought it made perfect sense and was easy to understand.
