View Single Post
Old 05-07-2013, 10:12 PM   #3637
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe View Post
RW is severely lacking in the Flames' prospect pool. LW'ers and Goalies seem to have some depth, Defence looks 'deep', but without any real blue-chip prospects, and Center is 'ok', though definitely not strong.

Flames don't even have many decent RW'ers on the team right now - biggest weakness by far in the prospect pool.

Nichushkin is listed as a LW, C and I have seen him as a RW'er. I actually wouldn't mind a gamble on this kid. Rumor has it that he has an NHL out-clause after his next year in the KHL. Not sure if that is true or not. I am starting to hope the Flames draft him. Great size, strength and speed, and I am starting to think he is less and less of a gamble. Who knows, he could end up being a much better center than Barkov, right? NHL is all about speed and skill now - couple that with really good size, and it starts to become tough to pass over him - 'gamble' and all.

I would probably think the Flames will draft a center, and then look for 2 RW'ers early (if they are anywhere in the ballpark of BPA of course - I don't they would, nor should they, select further down the list to shore-up a weakness). The defence core is still relatively young (even without including Brodie - still a few good years out of most of their top 4 defencemen).

With that being said, I don't really care what position the Flames end up picking in - as long as they select the BPA. They still have vets they can trade for additional picks next year (or even for this draft - but the price of picks seems to go higher closer to the draft), or can just trade some veterans for stop-gaps (with upside) as a worst-case scenario.

I do think some a team or two in the top 4 or 5 just might end up trading down a bit, and it will be really interesting to see how how much it costs a team to move up 'x' number of spots. Even moving from 5th to 4th might be pretty steep when talking about "4 elite prospects", vs the next '3 or 4 excellent prospects'.

That, to me, is makes Nichushkin a bit more attractive. You may just end up getting one of the best 3 forwards in the draft (or even THE best), without necessarily having to trade away very valuable assets moving up to get one.
Your post also makes a strong argument for taking Lindholm as well. Being weak on the RW it would not hurt taking the right handed shot of Lindholm either. Either way Nichushkin makes the top 8 of the draft a total crap shoot. Even better for any team if Nichushkin ends up being a center as he develops. As with many other players, they seem to play on the wing until they're moved to C.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post: