[united]

Originally Posted by fotze

Insert hyperbole about this suspension spelling the end of times.

Isn't there some clause now about not hitting a player in a susceptible position? Even though the player puts themself in it?

Eric Macramalla blogged on it this morning. There is a clause for excessive force even on legal contact.

Another important consideration is the NHL CBA. It sets out the factors relied upon when determining whether to impose supplemental discipline. Here's the language from the CBA:
In deciding on supplementary discipline, the following factors will be taken into account as per paragraph 6 of Schedule 8 (this is the old CBA but it shouldn’t change):
(a) The type of conduct involved: conduct outside of NHL rules; excessive force in contact otherwise permitted by NHL rules; and careless or accidental conduct. Players are responsible for the consequences of their actions.
(b) Injury to the opposing Player(s) involved in the incident.
(c) The status of the offender, and specifically whether he is a "first" or "repeat" offender. Players who repeatedly violate NHL rules will be more severely punished for each new violation.
(d) The situation of the game in which the incident occurred: late in the game,lopsided score, prior events in the game.
(e) Such other factors as may be appropriate in the circumstances.
Of there factors, Paragraph 6(a) is key. It provides for discipline in cases of illegal hits or legal hits delivered with excessive force.
http://offsidesportsblog.blogspot.ca/

I completely disagree with the ruling. The video explanation will reveal their thought process but I don't think it will change my mind.