View Single Post
Old 04-30-2013, 10:58 PM   #414
Hockey_Ninja
 
Hockey_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames View Post
Well, if that's true and it isn't just routine "checking out" of the player, then that could bode very well for us at 6. If one of Carolina or Nashville does take Nichuskin it significantly increases the chance of us getting to have our pick of Monahan or Lindholm, but also it increases the chance of Barkov falling to us as well. If one of them is a lock to take Nichuskin, all we need is the other GM having a personal/team preference of any of Monahan, Lindholm or Nurse and Barkov, who'll be NHL ready next year, will be ours.
I truly hope whoever we pick goes back to Junior or Europe or wherever they played last year (unless it was Mackinnon or Drouin who we won't be getting). No need to rush players in who aren't fully ready. I want this rebuild to be done properly and rushing our prospects in is not the right thing to do.
__________________
Just trying to do my best
Hockey_Ninja is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hockey_Ninja For This Useful Post: