I wonder why a smaller 4K panel costs less than a larger one for the same resolution - you'd think that it would be the other way around, as a larger panel of the same resolution has a lower pixel density, and thus is easier to manufacture, with fewer potential defects.
On the other hand, I'm guessing that a smaller panel has a sufficiently high pixel density that you can get by with a few dead pixels that nobody is capable of noticing, which they might on a larger display that has larger individual pixels.
__________________
-Scott
|