Quote:
Originally posted by Displaced Flames fan+Oct 1 2004, 12:53 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Displaced Flames fan @ Oct 1 2004, 12:53 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-CaramonLS@Oct 1 2004, 12:09 AM
If debates were in a more "classic" format, there is no doubt in my mind that Bush would be dominated by Kerry.#
There is just too many issues for Bush to get completely absolutely taken advantage of, and there is little doubt that Kerry has a much higher personal intellegence than Bush.
"Kerry waivers on issues" is about the worst I've heard against him from bush, and thats not saying much.
|
You've bought into that myth I see.
One of Kerry's top strategists said on TV the other day that he's never seen Bush lose a debate.
I'll take his word for it over yours. [/b][/quote]
I've bought into the Myth? In fact it was Kerry who wanted to have a debate a week until the election began. Bush was leaning towards 2 debates.
Sorry If I offended you because I think Bush isn't as smart as Kerry.
If it were a Punch/Counterpunch - especially with Kerry's background, he would win, hands down. But as some people seem to think it is, just people reading from a script.
Gotta love how they make a 32 page debate "rulebook" about debates. It would be much more entertaining and informative to see how each of these candidates do when ambushed or are under pressure.
**edit** I was not insulting Bush's previous debate record which you seem to think.
What would you like the Kerry Stratagist to come out say? "Kerry is going to beat Bush like a redheaded stepchild outside a woodshed?" Give your head a shake Dis.