Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC
If no other reasonable path exists, yes.
If the government signed a contract that says SebC and/or his descendents gets a billion dollars a year no questions asked, and that can only be revoked with the permission of SebC and/or his descendents (or cannot be revoked at all), would you argue that my funding must remain in place because there's a contract?
|
Yes? You really want to set up a legal precedent that allows the government to start tearing up legally binding agreements on the grounds of subjectivity?