Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
So then what you're actually saying is that the government should be able to tear up contracts it signs whenever it can mount a reasonable explanation to do so?
|
If no other reasonable path exists, yes.
If the government signed a contract that says SebC and/or his descendents gets a billion dollars a year no questions asked, and that can only be revoked with the permission of SebC and/or his descendents (or cannot be revoked at all), would you argue that my funding must remain in place because there's a contract?