View Single Post
Old 04-08-2013, 06:05 AM   #1113
FAN
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe View Post
I have no idea if this is correct or not - but I remember reading some (mis)information that said the clauses are either retained or not at the will of the franchise the player is moving to. Not sure if that is (or was) true or not, but the organization the player went to got to choose to retain the clauses or not.
As mentioned, that only applies to players traded before their NTC came into effect.

Quote:
Originally Posted by afc wimbledon View Post
Would make sense, after all the player and team have to draw up a new contract, either could, with the agreement of the other, change anything on it not covered by the CBA.
No that would not make sense. NHL contracts can't be modified. When players get traded, the contract is assigned/transferred to another team. The old CBA contained language that only applied to players who was traded before their NTC came into effect (which makes sense from a vesting point of view). From a practical standpoint, a player with NTC being asked to waive to go to another team can and is likely to dictate that the team trading for him honors his NTC in case he is to be traded again.
FAN is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FAN For This Useful Post: