Quote:
Originally Posted by timbit
I disagree with your assumption. Those are not top 6 forwards " on basically any team" and they are certainly not on a contending team.
The 3 D you mentioned are adequate to a little above average on a below average team . They are not top four on most contending teams .
If you disagree please show me where they would fit and who they would replace on some of the good teams.
Beacause these players look good sometimes with Calgary does top mean they are top 6 or top 3 on a contending or good team.
|
I think the top six and top 4 statement becomes a red herring because that implies some of them are too line and top pairing which they are not. We have a bunch of 4-6 forwards and a bunch of 3/4 defensemen. We are missing the top pairing and top line guys.