What really is 'untouchable' though?
I am sure that Feaster listened to some offers on Glencross even if nothing but sheer curiosity.
What I think 'untouchable' to this organization is an identification of what they feel are key players to retain in this organization for at least the duration of the rebuild. Flames don't seem to want to 'burn it to the ground'.
I can't say I disagree with them. As players get drafted and start populating the roster, and this is supported with key FA signings, it opens up room for these 'untouchables' to be traded (if need be). I also don't think he probably named everyone that was at the top of his head - Backlund (though not scoring too much) has a huge impact on the ice, and is young. Hudler and Wideman were just signed - I don't think the Flames would want to trade them so quickly, considering they are solid vets to keep around in this transition phase.
I just think it is just another one of Feaster's "ramblings" he likes to do at times.
|