Quote:
Originally Posted by browna
Sutter had the autonomy, and a stand up guy who the upper management laid off of until the fallout Phaneuf deal that next offseason...its been watered down since, and now its Feaster in there who is a puppet of King and Edwards and he's fine with that.
The person has to take no crap from anyone, however King defines meddling. For the big money deals, yes, the owners need to be on side and informed.
|
Your statements sound like you work within the organization and have witnessed the actions of management and the owners. Is this true? I don't know where you work, so it could be. This isn't meant to be taken as an attack, personal or otherwise. It's more just a question/discussion point.
I have often read on this forum, and other places, that King meddles too much, Feaster is a puppet, etc. I don't see how people can make these statements unless they see it firsthand or have a close acquaintance in or near one of these positions.
I'm not saying King does or does not meddle, or that Sutter did or did not have full autonomy. I'm just asking how specific statements can be made on these people, and be taken as fact, when they are mostly speculation.