Quote:
Originally posted by Delgar+Sep 30 2004, 01:19 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Delgar @ Sep 30 2004, 01:19 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-FlamesAllTheWay@Sep 29 2004, 11:43 PM
Wonder what's really changed from then and now that made Cheney pull a 180 on the whole issue of Iraq#  .
|
Two office towers in New York got knocked down.
I don't think the US should be in Iraq at all, but the world was seen as a much different place after 9/11. I'm sure he'll respond now by saying something like he didn't appreciate the full danger of terrorists and rouge states at the time. [/b][/quote]
Exactly, and I figured this would be brought up. But what did any of that have to do with Iraq? Seems like a bit of a flop to me, as nothing in Iraq has changed too much since 92. No progress on the WMD front (a regress if you ask me) was made, no new terrorist funding programs that had been developed (if any to begin with), etc.
Anyways, I just think it's funny to bring this up as a counter to all the accusations from Bush co. of Kerry flip/flops...