Quote:
Originally Posted by RT14
Pretty sure all we disagree on is whether he told Feaster to be asked about a deal first or not. If that's the case there's nothing I can do to prove to you that I'm right and you're wrong and you can't prove it vice versa, so I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.
|
We can't agree to disagree because I'm not making an assumption about an event and drawing a conclusion on it. I don't have a chosen position
because I don't have the required information, so I can't disagree with your conclusion, I think the conclusion is invalid not incorrect.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RT14
The evidence and "experts" word is enough evidence for me to lead me to that theory. Nuff said.
[Edit]And to add to my argument I'll steal from Wronskian:
|
A bunch of guys on twitter circulating the same thing around in a big circle does not mean it's true. Maybe they all have the same source who is wrong. Maybe they just re-report what they've read from the other guys in the circle. We've seen that lots in the recent past where the "experts" have been wrong in the end.