Quote:
Originally Posted by RT14
It became public knowledge that he had at the very least told Feaster that he needs to be confronted before any trade was made.
|
Where? I haven't seen anything to confirm this other than speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RT14
If we knew that, the other 29 GM's had to have knows it as well. If you're another GM, without hearing that, why would you need to get a guaranteed extension when he's already signed for another year?
|
Maybe they're after more than 1 year? That's still requiring an assumption to squeeze a fact support a hypothesis.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RT14
I would put good money on the extension requirement being a result of he and his agents requirements. Maybe I'm totally wrong, but that's how I see it right now.
|
He and his agent's requirements about what? Deciding not to retire? Well of course, if he's offered an extension, he can decide if he wants to take it or not. Nothing wrong with that. And a trading partner has to decide if they want to make a trade with or without an assurance of an extension.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RT14
Just disagree on the first part which leads us to him having to speak to other teams GM's and explain himself in such a way.
|
Him explaining himself is with respect to if he wants to sign an extension or not, and the only way a team can find out if he's willing to sign an extension is by talking to him.