Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports
If it's a business then the Flames shouldn't have given him such a contract.
Perhaps there was a wink-wink nudge-nudge when the contract was signed that Kipper was going to retire after this year.
If that's the case then it's the Flames that are wronging Kipper by trying to trade him at all.
We don't know.
|
Perhaps, but a contract is a legal obligation and it exisits. So the legal and business part of it stands.