View Single Post
Old 04-02-2013, 12:20 PM   #26
BACKCHECK!!!
First Line Centre
 
BACKCHECK!!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: TEXAS!!
Exp:
Default

Ok, I don't think the ROR offer sheet was a great idea, especially with the term that were being offered to him.

But signing a kid who is like 20 years old and already in the NHL is *perfectly consistent* with rebuilding. In fact, it's EXACTLY the kind of thing you should do when you are trying to rebuild.

Turning a 1st round pick into exctly the kind of player you are tryin to get in the 1st round, except that he's already got 2 years of NHL experience, is not a 'win now at the expense of the future' move.

I really don't understand why people don't see that. Its really, really simple.

What it your logic behind claiming that its the opposite of rebuilding? A 19 year old prospect means you're rebuildingm but a 20 year old NHLer means you're only trying to win now?
__________________
I am a lunatic whose world revolves around hockey and Oilers hate.
BACKCHECK!!! is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to BACKCHECK!!! For This Useful Post: