Quote:
Originally Posted by PsYcNeT
I don't get it. I mean, if the charity was corrupt I could understand the hate, but despite Armstrong's idiocy, the charity itself is run well enough.
|
It really doesn't matter, and this thread is evidence of that. Armstrong was far too strongly associated with the brand to have that taint vanish so easily. And with the years of deception and people aren't going to look at anything he was tied to as legitimate for a long time, which is a fair stance.