Quote:
Originally Posted by anyonebutedmonton
Not saying LSAT grades are directly correlated to intelligence, but in order to get into Georgetown, he likely shot between a 165-170. This would qualify him for Mensa (top 2%). The organization is stupid, but the point stands that it is almost a certainty that Feaster is more intelligent than the vast majority of CP posters.
Does this make him an incredible GM? Nope. But it makes the likelihood that he just outright did not understand the situation, ie did not take the best deal on the table, very low.
Argue that he is overvaluing a first rounder. Argue that the two prospects that they targetted are crap. But, please, do not premise your "FIRE FEASTER NOW" arguments on the fact that he simply made a terrible decision and could have gotten way more.
|
Is this really what this thread has come to? Feaster went to law school so he must be really smart, so we shouldn't criticize his trades?
I don't know how your math skills are, but I can tell you that roughly one in fifty CP posters should also be MENSA candidates, give or take. So should they be allowed to have an opinion on his trades?
I know that I am pretty comfortable having my own opinion, regardless of what school he went to.