View Single Post
Old 04-01-2013, 02:43 PM   #34
BACKCHECK!!!
First Line Centre
 
BACKCHECK!!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: TEXAS!!
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
That contract reminds me a lot of the Sarich contract that never really worked out that great for the Flames. Smid is not a bad defenseman but I wouldn't lock him up for four years.
I think that Sarich's contract worked out well enough for the Flames except for the very last year, and was overall a good signing. I think he played a very valuable role on the team, by effectively baby-sitting players like Giordano, Babchuk, and Brodie, which allowed the coaching staff to play them in more important situations.

Plus he made a few game-changing hits every season.

Granted, I think Sarich was better than Smid. But I think he can play a similar role, which is one this team will need moving forward with a roster consisting of not-overly-physical, puck-moving, primarily offensive defenders.

And I think a 4 year deal for a 27 year old defenceman is a good term.

Unfortunately, I think this is yet another in a series of decent signings by the Oilers, that are not great but are a net positive to the team.
__________________
I am a lunatic whose world revolves around hockey and Oilers hate.
BACKCHECK!!! is offline   Reply With Quote