Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community - View Single Post

#-3 · 03-31-2013, 02:09 PM

That Frederick Gauthier looks all to interesting.

6'5'' point per game a a rookie in the Q.
Although he was 17, i'm not sure where he was his 16 year old season.
+22, the team was 6th out of 18 in Goal Differential, and he is second on the team, so +/- is not just because he is on a good team.

Assuming our pick is a top 5, I don't see the flames moving down, they need that truly elite prospect. And I am sure that Pitts pick will be way to low to get him. So if Cammi, Tangs, or Bouw can be moved to another 20 - 30 pick. I would not mind seeing a package to move up into the 10 - 15 range and grab this guys.

This guy could be a scary second line center some day.

03-31-2013, 02:09 PM	#60
#-3 Franchise Player Join Date: Mar 2008 Exp:	That Frederick Gauthier looks all to interesting. 6'5'' point per game a a rookie in the Q. Although he was 17, i'm not sure where he was his 16 year old season. +22, the team was 6th out of 18 in Goal Differential, and he is second on the team, so +/- is not just because he is on a good team. Assuming our pick is a top 5, I don't see the flames moving down, they need that truly elite prospect. And I am sure that Pitts pick will be way to low to get him. So if Cammi, Tangs, or Bouw can be moved to another 20 - 30 pick. I would not mind seeing a package to move up into the 10 - 15 range and grab this guys. This guy could be a scary second line center some day.