Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275
I think you are missing my point. I also think that the Boston deal was bad, but that does not make the Pitt trade good. It just makes it the Pitt deal better than the Boston deal. Neither of the 2 deals should have been on the table when Iggy was making his decission.
We have a GM and ownership group that could not get a guaratnteed 1st from Boston and could not get anything other than "meh" players from Pitt included with a guarantee 1st. By no means did i think they could get a blue chip prospect, but they should have been able to get a better player than the 2 they got.
There is not one media guy that thinks Feaster and Co did not get raped on this deal.
|
Right...and if there is anything last night taught us, its that media guys are to be trusted with what they think things are....should be construed as fact.
Good lord.