Quote:
Originally Posted by Makarov
Yes, but that is still relying massively on resource revenue that should, in my opinion, be going into the Heritage Fund (or be used for some extraordinary long term strategic infrastructure investments.)
|
They are saying that we have a revenue problem because resource revenue is down this year. I am saying that the first 6.5 billion is a spending problem. If they could save the spending then we would be able to put away billions in resource revenue every time there is a year where the revenues aren't terrible.
We can argue about how much should be saved, but it is hard to do when so much is being spent.