Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86
I never dismissed it as frivolous, that was another poster. I'm not saying it is or it isn't, since I haven't seen the contract, I have no way of knowing.
However, your assertion that they have at least a credible argument or they wouldn't have raised it/asked for the money doesn't match my experiences. I've dealt with contractors many times, and they often ask for money they have no entitlement to. I find oftentimes the more "loudly" and emphatically they ask, and the more veiled comments about lawyers they make, the less strong their actual claim is.
Just because Graham says so doesn't mean anything, imo.
|
Have those contractors been facing a situation where they would be barred from a massive amount of high dollar figure contracts simply by bringing a suit?
I should add that I'm operating here under the assumption that Graham actually intends to sue, which could very well not be the case.