Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
Personally no, but I've had it happen to clients. That doesn't mean that Graham absolutely isn't entitled, they likely have at least a credible argument otherwise this issue wouldn't be raised. My point is simply that you can't just dismiss it as frivolous if you don't have actual knowledge of the contract and the facts.
|
I never dismissed it as frivolous, that was another poster. I'm not saying it is or it isn't, since I haven't seen the contract, I have no way of knowing.
However, your assertion that they have at least a credible argument or they wouldn't have raised it/asked for the money doesn't match my experiences. I've dealt with contractors many times, and they often ask for money they have no entitlement to. I find oftentimes the more "loudly" and emphatically they ask, and the more veiled comments about lawyers they make, the less strong their actual claim is.
Just because Graham says so doesn't mean anything, imo.