View Single Post
Old 03-13-2013, 12:07 PM   #2464
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
I don't know why the city shouldn't have the right to do the same thing as any private company would do. Not allowing the city to pick who they want to give contracts to could very easily open them up to fraudulent contractors who would repeated sue the city. Saying Graham couldn't bid on projects doesn't mean that projects wouldn't get tendered.
I am not a lawyer but how does a legit legal claim that is awarded by a court opening them up to fraudulent contractors?

I have no issue if they want to ban any contractor that brings fraudlent claims against them or even unsuccessful claims but to ban anyone who takes them to court even if their claims were legit seems to be a way to allow the city to bully companies into ignoring legit concerns.

Perhaps you allow a private company to act like this as they are the ones that have to deal with the reprecussions but for a city to possibly ignore the best company because the city screwed up and the company wanted the money they were rightly owed seems like a horrible policy.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to moon For This Useful Post: