Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
OR, the contract includes language that would require you to pay additional sums for certain things that may occur in the future, and the contractor has every right to collect those sums. Somehow you've concluded that Graham has no right to this money, when the fact is we have no idea. A policy that allows a taxpayer funded entity to deny access to legal recourse is fundamentally flawed.
|
Yes we do have an idea.
What owner is going to include a clause in a contract that allows a contractor to collect MORE money in the case that the contractor screws up?
No one said that Graham isn't entitled to legal recourse. They absolutely are. However, just like anywhere in real life, if you take legal recourse, you risk severing the relationship built up between the two parties.