Quote:
Originally Posted by Addick
It could be liability thing where The City identifies the firm as too risky to deal with due to their likeliness to engage in unnecessary and costly litigation.
|
If it said that any firm that unsuccessfully sued the city would be barred then that could make sense, but as it is (at least based on what we have here) it pretty much says 'we can screw you over and if you ever want to do business again you're going to shut your mouth and like it'. That's all well and good for private companies, but for a municipality to take that stance is troubling.
Edit: What he ^^ said