Quote:
Originally Posted by Addick
It could be liability thing where The City identifies the firm as too risky to deal with due to their likeliness to engage in unnecessary and costly litigation.
|
Right, which would be fair enough in the event that an action brought by said contractor was found (by the court) to be vexatious or totally without merit. However, it doesn't sound like the city's policy makes this distinction (in fairness though, we only have an unsubstantiated second hand account of the policy at this point, so who knows what the actual policy is [if one even exists.])