Quote:
Originally Posted by moon
LOL
That's right I don't agree with you so it must be some garbage "moon makes up his mind beforehand."
Hudler has been a second line type of player like expected. He is paid too much for too long and shouldn't be looked at as a solution to our problems but he makes some fancy plays that keep some fans happy and ready to ignore his many flaws.
Others have mentioned Wideman's struggles outside of the offensive zone so I am not alone here. Watching him play 2 minutes on a PP that struggles at times to generate shots let alone chances isn't really that impressive to me. He has been an overall poor player while in Calgary.
It is possible that people can have difference of opinions without cheap, baseless personal attacks.
|
Every player has flaws and if you go looking for them you're sure to find.
Hudler will go screen the goalie on the pp (one of our few f that will) and has an above average hockey iq. An upgrade on Jokinen many would argue. Wideman brings an element to the team that we lacked last year and is an upgrade over Hannan.
I think why you get targeted is because most ofyour posts have a negative undertone and while we don't have to be Pollyannas about the team being negative Nancy all the time isn't necessary either.