Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC
I noted that they didn't source that at all... but even if Chima was pissed at Ungar's comments, he has every to right to be, as it is demonstrably false that there is anything close to an effective freeze on suburban development. ... at least until we get the Growth Management Framework
|
Growth Management has no effect on land supply - serviced or planned. City still has policy of minimum 5 years serviced land and 15 years planned land.
Growth Management sequences that growth in a way that is more logical and does so with transparent decision making criteria. Some say that picks winners and losers. It does, but the old system picks winners and losers too - but did so in an opaque way and the result was sequencing that was less efficient (e.g. Sliverado, Skyview Ranch).