Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community - View Single Post

Cheese · 03-05-2013, 09:40 AM

^^ it might be suggested that if all/most/some of the biblical scholars were positive that a Jesus of the bible existed, that information and its sources would have flowed freely down to the public in a manner that is easily viable and justifiable?

The reason people like Hitchens had an easy time ripping apart those who speak of Jesus and the various other groups, is because there does not seem to be anything/one else relevant to tear apart?
Further, IF the scholars know and or are ~100% sure that Jesus lived, why didn't they stand up and take him on? Why didn't they come to the side of those who chose to put themselves in Hitchen's scope?
I dont think Christopher would have turned any discussion down, and didnt that Im aware of unless they were complete ######bags.

Those with the knowledge should freely share in a way that the public can understand it "plainly and clearly". To this point in time I am not aware of anything or anyone that has done so. Hitchens was able to make things very very clear even when he was utilizing his dictionary like vocabulary.

03-05-2013, 09:40 AM	#157
Cheese Franchise Player Join Date: Mar 2002 Exp:	^^ it might be suggested that if all/most/some of the biblical scholars were positive that a Jesus of the bible existed, that information and its sources would have flowed freely down to the public in a manner that is easily viable and justifiable? The reason people like Hitchens had an easy time ripping apart those who speak of Jesus and the various other groups, is because there does not seem to be anything/one else relevant to tear apart? Further, IF the scholars know and or are ~100% sure that Jesus lived, why didn't they stand up and take him on? Why didn't they come to the side of those who chose to put themselves in Hitchen's scope? I dont think Christopher would have turned any discussion down, and didnt that Im aware of unless they were complete ######bags. Those with the knowledge should freely share in a way that the public can understand it "plainly and clearly". To this point in time I am not aware of anything or anyone that has done so. Hitchens was able to make things very very clear even when he was utilizing his dictionary like vocabulary. Last edited by Cheese; 03-05-2013 at 01:56 PM.