Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschoolcalgary
but Feaster's statement says he was well aware of that clause. I don't think that is up for debate. He says they chose to interpret it differently.
so, again, it comes down to Feaster rolling the dice on his interpretation being correct.
Is that a good risk? Depends, it seems, on one's support of Feaster.
|
Ya that's what he said. Is that really what happened or did Feaster simply made a PR statement? I think it's up for debate, but like I said, I'm willing to forgive Feaster if he wasn't aware of the rule, but I'm not willing to forgive an ignorant and defiant Feaster who took the risks he supposedly took.