Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
The NHLPA certainly would have sided with Feaster. It would be more beneficial to the players if Feaster successfully defended his position.
|
IF PA is on Feaster's side, WHY did PA allow NHL to officially articulate things that are against what they had agreed on? Imagine if NHL have articulated to some franchise some thing that is against CBA and harms players' position. PA would be all over it. PA could very well side with the NHL because NHL's interpretation is (most likely) exactly what they had agreed on.