Quote:
Originally Posted by afc wimbledon
For all of you argueing the finer details of the CBA I would ask you to consider this, it doesn't matter, all that matters is was Feater risking two picks and a couiple of million with this deal and what was the payoff?
I would argue there is no way it was worth risking much of anything to sign a fairly average priced center with a history of contract problems to a short term deal, in fact the offer was questionable without the waiver risk, it looks insane with it.
|
The whole purpose of "arguing the finer details of the CBA" (MOU) is to determine whether or not Feaster was in fact taking those risks.
Simply accepting a reportor's word, who believes that the Flames took undo risk and condemning the Flames for it is unfair and pretty pathetic.
However, attempting to understand exactly what is going on so that we can, in a more educated manner, assess ourselves whether or not Feaster took an irresponsible risk, seems like a worthwhile exercise to some of us.
Feel free to not participate if you disagree.