Quote:
Originally Posted by afc wimbledon
If true this would be the definition of doing something stupid, as in 'we could get a player at a high salary and the cost of a 1st and a 2nd pick, not exactly a bargin, or we could lose both picks and 2.5 million and not get anything.
The only way it makes sense to try an offer sheet this expensive to the kid is if you think there is no risk, as the offer itself isn't a bargin.
|
You might not like the terms of the contract but the Flames head office must have liked it which trumps everyone else's opinion of the terms. Feaster is a hockey lawyer he probably knows the new CBA inside out by now which is why he made the offer he did, again, he's not an idiot.