View Single Post
Old 03-02-2013, 07:16 PM   #1418
Iowa_Flames_Fan
Referee
 
Iowa_Flames_Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Over the hill
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry Fool View Post
Aren't you missing the point here still? There was no trade involved. The question is whether or not the clause applies to Calgary because the player was not on Calgary's RFA list.
You very evidently still have not read the language that is in dispute. I am not "missing the point." The language of the exception applies to RFA players, not their clubs. That is why the "for greater clarity" clause is in there. The exception has nothing to do with trades at all.

Look, we can waste our time on faux outrage over a fabricated controversy, or we can just move on with our lives, recognizing that a) Feaster was very likely right, and b) it's moot anyway. Life is short, and outrage is a precious commodity. Let's save it for Burrows dives and broadcasters who love the Oilers.
Iowa_Flames_Fan is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Iowa_Flames_Fan For This Useful Post: