Quote:
Originally Posted by Otto29
Yes I do understand that. The point is that the case was being made to replace King with Burke. My point is to define why that's a horrible idea
|
Just because one is a business operations position, and the other is hockey operations, it doesn't mean they're exclusive. They work with eachother regularly. Your explaination isn't much of one as to why Burke wouldn't be a good President. Personally, I think he's astute enough to be President as he is very intuned with business decision making, but his hockey operations would be better suited for the Flames as has been shown by his deal history. Giving him both would probably not work out well as evidence by the few teams who've attempted it (including Sutter's stint).