While I voted Yes initially I have to admit the water looks a lot muddier now. Not as clear as it first seems. I dont think it'll get to the point where its clearly laid out, Feaster seems to firmly believe his position and his statement seems to indicate that he would be ready to legally defend his interpretation of the rule. Even if he is absolutely wrong or right there appears to be a protective layer of doubt going both ways that will prevent him from being held accountable on this issue.
|