Quote:
Originally Posted by fleury
Again, you're attacking Burke's character over the substance of his deals or strategy. How would his "act would grow thin" would affect the on-ice product? You're basically saying he'd get let go over his brazen attitude and ignoring the possiblity of what he can bring to the on-ice product. Do you not agree with his style of teams built? I just don't get it.
|
My problem isn't with Burke. I don't know how many different ways I can say this. My problem is the ongoing cycle of bringing in a guy with a new direction/strategy.
I believe direction is organizational (Philaderlphia, Detroit, Nashville on a low budget, more recently St Louis).
What I am saying is, get the organizational direction established with the right president.
Then find a GM that fits the organization.
I don 't dislike Burke. I am simply saying that hiring a Burke is yet another attempt to spin the wheel and try yet another new collection of decisions. And in a few years, do it again.