Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJim
just asking...Where does anyone confirm that this is what Jay's interpretation was? I've just been reading all of the posts on this thread and others, and the various articles on this subject, and it seems that a lot of persons are now acknowledging that the was not a bungled transaction and was something that actually has some thought put into it, albeit a gamble.
|
The Flames statement did not go into specifics, so I don't think that confirmation exists, and probably never will.
Which is why I really wish Johnston had a Flames statement in his story, so that we could know what their thinking was at the time. For Feaster to say it was O'Reilly's unsigned status now, well I'm sure the easy response is "Yeah, right Feaster. NOW you say that. You're just covering your ass"